From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Qingning Huo Subject: Re: [PATCH] Invoke git-repo-config directly. Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:30:14 +0000 Message-ID: <20060314213014.GA12862@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060314211022.GA12498@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, junkio@cox.net X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 14 22:33:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJH5r-0002v0-JA for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:30:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751855AbWCNVaM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:30:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751918AbWCNVaM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:30:12 -0500 Received: from mta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:28114 "EHLO mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751855AbWCNVaK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:30:10 -0500 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060314213009.WWYJ1060.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:30:09 +0000 Received: from rabbit.zoo.mayhq.org ([80.0.127.16]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP id <20060314213008.IHBN20480.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@rabbit.zoo.mayhq.org> for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:30:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 12887 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Mar 2006 21:30:14 -0000 To: Johannes Schindelin Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:20:53PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Qingning Huo wrote: > > > - var=`git repo-config --get pull.octopus` > > + var=`git-repo-config --get pull.octopus` > > This is unlikely to be applied; there are plans to have a "libexec" path > in which all git executables are stored, and just the "git" wrapper in the > path. Your patch would break git in those setups. > I do not mind whether this patch is applied. What I want is git calls its helper programs, instead of any random git program in my PATH. If git-programs are installed to libexec path, how about calling them with absolute path? Regards, Qingning