From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Larson Subject: Re: xm-test failures? Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:31:38 -0600 Message-ID: <200603150931.41234.pl@us.ibm.com> References: <44174C44.3080702@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1036991951==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <44174C44.3080702@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============1036991951== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1307690.TBaoQ05Nan"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1307690.TBaoQ05Nan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17:05, Anthony Liguori wrote: > There seems to be a large number of xm-test failures in current tip. Is > anyone else seeing this (~15 FAILs). I'm attempting to figure out what > changeset broke things. Actually I'm seeing even worse, I have a report of 36 Fails here, and am=20 trying to investigate. =2DPaul Larson --nextPart1307690.TBaoQ05Nan Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEGDNdBwrpIrndMlIRAl8hAKCK59KL6OfIH/PQo3z9AhlWLzzZTACeL4rp mOv65HU81Sn6ffIqmRJa3gU= =yann -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1307690.TBaoQ05Nan-- --===============1036991951== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============1036991951==--