From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume
	test
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:58:41 +0000
Message-ID: <20060315095841.GB20619@leeni.uk.xensource.com>
References: <1142360879.5335.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1142360879.5335.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>
Cc: danms@us.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:

> This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume
> cycles of the TPM front- and backend.
> Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the
> test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies
> previous tests and the APIs used there.

Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best way to
detect sysfs capabilities.  I presume your patch depends upon Dan's, and I've
been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch that everyone's
happy with.

Ewan.