All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fastboot mailing list <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Morton Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	gregkh@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Expanding the size of "start" and "end" field in "struct resource"
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:53:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060315205306.GC25361@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060315193114.GA7465@in.ibm.com>

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:31:14PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Is there a reason why "start" and "end" field of "struct resource" are of
> type unsigned long. My understanding is that "struct resource" can be used
> to represent any system resource including physical memory. But unsigned
> long is not suffcient to represent memory more than 4GB on PAE systems. 
> and compiler starts throwing warnings. 

Please make this depend on the kernel being compiled with PAE.  We don't 
need to bloat 32 bit kernels needlessly.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <dont@kvack.org>.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-15 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-15 19:31 [RFC][PATCH] Expanding the size of "start" and "end" field in "struct resource" Vivek Goyal
2006-03-15 19:48 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 19:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 20:01   ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 20:10     ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 20:13     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 20:28       ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 20:37         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 20:32       ` Vivek Goyal
2006-03-15 20:58         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:57   ` David S. Miller
2006-03-15 20:53 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2006-03-15 21:05   ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 21:13     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-15 21:29       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:28         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-15 21:50           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 22:13             ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 22:18               ` David S. Miller
2006-03-15 21:59           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 22:07             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-16 14:45               ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:30       ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-15 21:35         ` hackmiester / Hunter Fuller
2006-03-15 21:31       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:15     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 21:26     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-15 21:37       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-15 22:08 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060315205306.GC25361@kvack.org \
    --to=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.