All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	ck@vds.kolivas.org, Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:14:23 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603181714.23977.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441B9E5A.1040703@yahoo.com.au>

cc'ed GregKH for comment hopefully.

On Saturday 18 March 2006 16:44, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I added the suspend_pass member to struct scan_control within an #ifdef
> > CONFIG_PM to allow it to not be unnecessarily compiled in in the
> > !CONFIG_PM case and wanted to avoid having the #ifdefs in vmscan.c so
> > moved it to a header file.
>
> Oh no, that rule thumb isn't actually "don't put ifdefs in .c files", but
> people commonly say it that way anyway. The rule is actually that you
> should put ifdefs in declarations rather than call/usage sites.

There isn't a formal reference to this in the Codingstyle documentation, but 
Greg's 2002 ols presentation says simply says no ifdefs in .c files.

http://www.kroah.com/linux/talks/ols_2002_kernel_codingstyle_talk/html/mgp00031.html

I'm confused now because I've been working very hard to do this with all code.

> You did the right thing there by introducing the accessor, which moves the
> ifdef out of code that wants to query the member right? But you can still
> leave it in the .c file if it is local (which it is).

Once again I'm happy to do the right thing; I'm just not sure what that is.

Cheers,
Con

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	ck@vds.kolivas.org, Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:14:23 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603181714.23977.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441B9E5A.1040703@yahoo.com.au>

cc'ed GregKH for comment hopefully.

On Saturday 18 March 2006 16:44, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I added the suspend_pass member to struct scan_control within an #ifdef
> > CONFIG_PM to allow it to not be unnecessarily compiled in in the
> > !CONFIG_PM case and wanted to avoid having the #ifdefs in vmscan.c so
> > moved it to a header file.
>
> Oh no, that rule thumb isn't actually "don't put ifdefs in .c files", but
> people commonly say it that way anyway. The rule is actually that you
> should put ifdefs in declarations rather than call/usage sites.

There isn't a formal reference to this in the Codingstyle documentation, but 
Greg's 2002 ols presentation says simply says no ifdefs in .c files.

http://www.kroah.com/linux/talks/ols_2002_kernel_codingstyle_talk/html/mgp00031.html

I'm confused now because I've been working very hard to do this with all code.

> You did the right thing there by introducing the accessor, which moves the
> ifdef out of code that wants to query the member right? But you can still
> leave it in the .c file if it is local (which it is).

Once again I'm happy to do the right thing; I'm just not sure what that is.

Cheers,
Con

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-18  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-10 17:04 Faster resuming of suspend technology Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11  7:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-11 12:17   ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11 12:46     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-12  9:26       ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-12 17:54         ` Jim Crilly
2006-03-12 23:06           ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-20 12:45             ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-21 11:33               ` Fwd: " Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-21 11:33                 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-27 23:57                 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-28  0:28                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28  0:28                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 12:48                     ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2006-03-28 12:48                       ` Keir Fraser
2006-03-12 21:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-12 22:30   ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13  1:43     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-13 10:12       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:10         ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-14 10:32           ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:06   ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:35     ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13 10:43       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:13         ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-13 11:36           ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was Re: [ck] Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.] Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 12:03             ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was " Con Kolivas
2006-03-14  5:13               ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14  8:24                 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-14 11:51                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 12:33                   ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:43                     ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 17:36                   ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 21:34                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 18:06               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-14 21:45                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-15 10:37             ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was " Stefan Seyfried
2006-03-15 17:59               ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-15 21:32                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-16 10:33                 ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:46                   ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 10:47                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:50                       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 21:33                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 21:44                           ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 22:15                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-17  4:28                             ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks was: " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17  4:46                               ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17  6:17                                 ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks 2 Con Kolivas
2006-03-17 17:31                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-18  4:14                                     ` [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:14                                       ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:41                                       ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:41                                         ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:46                                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:46                                           ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:52                                           ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:52                                             ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:56                                             ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:56                                               ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  5:44                                               ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  5:44                                                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  6:14                                                 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-03-18  6:14                                                   ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  8:30                                                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  8:30                                                     ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  9:40                                                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  9:40                                                       ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:55                     ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Andreas Mohr
2006-03-17  5:23                     ` 2.6.16-rc6: swsusp cannot find swap partition Mark Lord
2006-03-17  5:34                       ` Mark Lord
2006-03-16 11:31                   ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16  2:20               ` swsusp_suspend continues? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16  9:19                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 16:12                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603181714.23977.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=seife@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.