From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmFI-00047B-Mi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:10:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmFG-000455-MJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:10:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLmFG-000451-Gk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:10:18 -0500 Received: from [193.7.176.20] (helo=bender.bawue.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1FLmFJ-0000aX-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:10:21 -0500 Received: from lagash (unknown [194.74.144.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043B044672 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:10:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from ths by lagash with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FLmFN-0005Tr-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:10:25 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:10:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] how about gcc4 compatibility Message-ID: <20060321191025.GA10618@networkno.de> References: <1142960117.2542.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200603211701.18261.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603211701.18261.paul@codesourcery.com> From: Thiemo Seufer Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:01:16PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 16:55, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > > Hi, > > gcc4 is more and more default on many distribution, how about qemu and > > gcc4 problem? > > http://kidsquid.com/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#head-9cd72ae5d3bd7b85d2538c0db933236b3c7e9bd9 FWIW, the patch for gcc 4.0 support I posted a while ago seems to hold up well -- on powerpc/Linux. Given the issues mentioned, it may well fail on x86. Thiemo