From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: virtualization@lists.osdl.org
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>,
Dan Arai <arai@vmware.com>, Anne Holler <anne@vmware.com>,
Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@vmware.com>,
Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>,
Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@ira.uka.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Rik Van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@vmware.com>,
Jack Lo <jlo@vmware.com>, Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@novell.com>,
Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
Leendert van Doorn <leendert@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 19/24] i386 Vmi mmu changes
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603222120.06145.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603131813.k2DIDo1g005760@zach-dev.vmware.com>
On Monday 13 March 2006 19:13, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> MMU code movement. Unfortunately, this one is a little bit more
> complicated than the rest. We have to override the default accessors
> that directly write to page table entries. Because of the 2/3-level
> PAE split in Linux, this turned out to be really ugly at first, but
> by allowing the sub-arch layer to override the definitions and keeping
> the native definitions in place, the code becomes much cleaner.
This patch definitely needs to be split up more.
-Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 18:13 [RFC, PATCH 19/24] i386 Vmi mmu changes Zachary Amsden
2006-03-13 18:13 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-22 20:20 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603222120.06145.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anne@vmware.com \
--cc=arai@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jlo@vmware.com \
--cc=jreddy@vmware.com \
--cc=jtl@ira.uka.de \
--cc=kmacy@fsmware.com \
--cc=ksrinivasan@novell.com \
--cc=leendert@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pratap@vmware.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.