From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 stability
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:06:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20060323160616.GA28447@favonius>
References: <e50d039c0603230643j178ce23dj3b938dea6cd6686c@mail.gmail.com> <1143128490.21108.38.camel@dacun.noviforum.si>
Reply-To: sander@humilis.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-28325-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1143128490.21108.38.camel@dacun.noviforum.si>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Gorazd Golob <gorazd.golob@noviforum.si>
Cc: Robert Hulme <rob@robhulme.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Gorazd Golob wrote (ao):
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 14:43 +0000, Robert Hulme wrote:
> > Can anyone give me a feel for how reliable you consider the Reiser 4
> > file system to be?
> 
> I'm using it on my workstation for more than a year - for now without
> a problem.
> I guess for desktop system is stable enough.. 

I use it on my desktop and a few servers, some since early 2005. Never
caused me serious trouble (save for the major performance regression
late 2005 - early 2006).

Reiserfs (v3) also never let me down.

	Sander

-- 
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net