From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: TLS support - status - need for re-testing
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:14:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060323211424.GA6130@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603230317.48384.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:17:45AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Jeff, I've looked at all other patches _names_ and they're patches which I
> already have, so I shouldn't have lost any other changes.
I think I didn't change any of your patches - any changes I made got
their own patches, so you should be safe.
> Plus, I've just done a couple of other cleanups of the TLS code, removing dead
> code which was there for experiments; I've implemented 2.4 host detection (I
> hope I've not forgot to check the host_supports_tls variable anywhere), and
> I'm ripping out global-ldt-sem which I longly hated (and which isn't easy to
> avoid).
Do you have a set of patches which are candidates for akpm? I'm
looking at
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.15-bb6/broken-out/series
and that seems unsuitable, as some patches seem to reverse earlier
ones.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-23 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-23 2:17 [uml-devel] TLS support - status - need for re-testing Blaisorblade
2006-03-23 11:29 ` [uml-devel] " Antoine Martin
2006-03-23 21:14 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2006-03-23 23:44 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 1:51 ` Jeff Dike
2006-03-24 10:39 ` Antoine Martin
2006-03-24 11:44 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 11:43 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 4:17 ` Jeff Dike
2006-03-24 11:43 ` Blaisorblade
2006-03-24 17:32 ` Jeff Dike
2006-03-24 18:44 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060323211424.GA6130@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=antoine@nagafix.co.uk \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.