From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Shoemaker Subject: Re: Errors GITtifying GCC and Binutils Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:39:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20060324003944.GA28652@pe.Belkin> References: <20060322133337.GU20746@lug-owl.de> <20060323200306.GG31387@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 24 01:39:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMaLI-0006Cl-1w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:39:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751493AbWCXAjq (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:39:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751500AbWCXAjq (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:39:46 -0500 Received: from eastrmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.240.36]:5563 "EHLO eastrmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751493AbWCXAjp (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:39:45 -0500 Received: from localhost ([24.250.31.7]) by eastrmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060324003936.PWTJ29285.eastrmmtao03.cox.net@localhost>; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:39:36 -0500 Received: from chris by localhost with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FMaLA-0007SY-75; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:39:44 -0500 To: Jan-Benedict Glaw Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060323200306.GG31387@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-22 17:28:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > This one-liner to cvsps.c seems to make sure we have an ancestor branch > > > for that "gdb-4.18-branch" branch, at least according to the cvsps output. > > > > The "git cvsimport" is still running, but at least it seems to be happily > > running further past the point it broke earlier. > > I've started it once again, too, with the one-liner added to Debian > unstable's version of cvsps: > > It seems there's a patch like > http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0602/16278.html is missing? > ...or we need a better cvsps. Shall I add it and try again / try to > continue, or give up on it for now? Though it would be nice to have > these two large and important source trees under GIT control :-) You make want to try the cvsps patch I attached to the email here: http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/11812.html Good luck! -chris