From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Kallol Biswas <Kallol_Biswas@pmc-sierra.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: memory with __get_free_pages and disabling caching
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:25:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060324182549.C20731@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143248571.3710.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from benh@kernel.crashing.org on Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:02:51PM +1100
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:02:51PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's how it works. After being allocated by the dma api
> > routines, the direct map is never accessed. Accessing the same
> > physical address via the cached direct map would cause serious
> > problems but you aren't allowed to touch address space like
> > that unless it's been allocated through a kernel allocator for
> > your use.
>
> That is still broken for at least 6xx CPUs ... they may well prefetch it
> and you die...
Right.
> For example, page A is a normal page allocated for kernel use, page B
> just a after A is used by the DMA allocator for uncacheable accesses
> (and is thus mapped twice). If something does a loop going through an
> array in page A, you have no guarantee that some smart prefetcher &
> speculative accesses will not bring bits of page B into the cache since
> it's mapped and cacheable...
We had a similar scenario on 4xx with the smart prefetching that is
used in copy_tofrom_user. It had to be modified not to prefetch
across pages for 4xx. Eugene first saw corruption due to adjacent
page prefetches into a dmaable page.
-Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-25 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-24 23:44 memory with __get_free_pages and disabling caching Kallol Biswas
2006-03-25 0:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-03-25 0:29 ` Matt Porter
2006-03-25 0:27 ` Matt Porter
2006-03-25 1:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-03-25 1:25 ` Matt Porter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-24 19:13 Kallol Biswas
2006-03-24 19:29 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-24 22:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-24 22:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-03-24 2:15 Kallol Biswas
2006-03-24 3:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060324182549.C20731@cox.net \
--to=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Kallol_Biswas@pmc-sierra.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.