From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move SG_GET_SCSI_ID from sg to scsi
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:25:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060327172530.GH3486@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603270854570.15714@g5.osdl.org>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 09:15:35AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > There are two things that really count:
> > 1) the identifier (preferably a world wide unique name)
> > of the logical unit that is being addressed
> > 2) a topological description of how that logical unit
> > is connected
>
> And "SCSI ID" doesn't describe either.
>
> > Linux's <hctl> may be a ham fisted way of describing
> > a path through a topology, but it easily beats /dev/sdabc
> > and /dev/sg4711 .
>
> Sure, you can easily beat it by selecting what you compare it against.
>
> But face it, /dev/sdabc or /dev/sg4711 simply isn't what you should
> compare against. What you should compare against is
>
> /dev/cdrom
> /sys/bus/ide/devices/0.0/block:hda/dev
> /dev/uuid/3d9e6e8dfaa3d116
> ..
>
> and a million OTHER ways to specify which device you're interested in.
>
> The fact is, they can potentially all do the SCSI command set. And a "SCSI
> ID" makes absolutely zero sense for them (those three devices may be the
> same device, they may not be, they might be on another machine, who
> knows..)
If this ioctl is generally supported, then you'll be able to find out if
they're all the same ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-27 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-26 19:28 [PATCH] Move SG_GET_SCSI_ID from sg to scsi Bodo Eggert
2006-03-26 19:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-26 20:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-26 20:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-26 20:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 10:11 ` Bodo Eggert
2006-03-27 15:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-26 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-26 23:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-27 0:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 11:42 ` Bodo Eggert
2006-03-28 9:43 ` Matthias Andree
2006-03-27 15:03 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-03-27 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 17:25 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-03-27 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 19:54 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-27 21:29 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-03-28 7:37 ` Stefan Richter
2006-03-28 14:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-26 23:09 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060327172530.GH3486@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.