All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Some section mismatch in acpi_processor_power_init on ia64 build
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:16:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060328161624.A31861@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F0613EDAB@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>; from tony.luck@intel.com on Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:09:36PM -0800

On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:09:36PM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> I've only just noticed these warnings when building ia64 !SMP or
> !HOTPLUG_CPU
> kernels:
> 
> WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o - Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.data: from .text between 'acpi_processor_power_init' (at offset
> 0x5040) and 'acpi_processor_power_exit'
> WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o - Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.data: from .text between 'acpi_processor_power_init' (at offset
> 0x5050) and 'acpi_processor_power_exit'
> 
> According to git bisect, they began with Matt Domsch's "ia64: use i386
> dmi_scan.c"
> patch (commit 3ed3bce8), but it appears that the real issue may be
> further back when
> Ashok Raj marked processor_power_dmi_table as __cpuinitdata in 7ded5689
> with a
> cryptic comment by AK (Andi Kleen?):
>   /* Actually this shouldn't be __cpuinitdata, would be better to fix
> the
>      callers to only run once -AK */
> 
> -Tony

Humm.. originally they were marked as __initdata, but for CPU hotplug we call it
when processor gets hot plugged. So i changed it to __cpuinitdata so that when we use
cpu hotplug they stay resident.

the only reference is to that table is from acpi_processor_power_init(), that gets called 
currently only from acpi_processor_start().

the code is either compiled in kernel (which means it will be all thrown after free
init mem if !HOTPLUG_CPU) or if this is a module code, then __initdata/cpuinit doesnt 
make a difference.

possibly acpi_processor_start(), acpi_processor_power_init() etc should also be
__cpuinit, which would make the warning go away. 

Are there any others i missed Andi? maybe this is a general watch out comment, but 
he knows better.

-- 
Cheers,
Ashok Raj
- Open Source Technology Center

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-29  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-28 23:09 Some section mismatch in acpi_processor_power_init on ia64 build Luck, Tony
2006-03-29  0:00 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-29  0:58   ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-29  0:16 ` Ashok Raj [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060328161624.A31861@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.