From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750969AbWC3V2V (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:28:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750972AbWC3V2V (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:28:21 -0500 Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.202]:37022 "HELO smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750969AbWC3V2R (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:28:17 -0500 From: David Brownell To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: Handling devices that don't have a bus Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:28:04 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Greg KH , Russell King , Kernel development list References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603301328.05431.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 30 March 2006 12:45 pm, Alan Stern wrote: > What's the right thing to do here? I suppose one solution would be to use a class device, but that gets into the utter pointlessness of having classes that may never have more than a single member ... :)