From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jakub@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.16 - futex: small optimization (?)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:01:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060331060155.GA21975@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <442C3F3F.5050107@tmr.com>
* Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
> >>>There are no such situations anymore in an optimal userlevel
> >>>implementation. The last problem (in pthread_cond_signal) was fixed
> >>>by the addition of FUTEX_WAKE_OP. The userlevel code you're looking
> >>>at is simply not optimized for the modern kernels.
> >>What are you suggesting here, that the kernel can be inefficient as
> >>long as the user has a way to program around it?
> >
> >What are you suggesting here, that FUTEX_WAKE_UP is a "user way to
> >program around" an inefficiency? If yes then please explain to me why
> >and what you would do differently.
>
> The point I'm making is that even if an application is "not optimized
> for modern kernels" or whatever, there's no reason to ignore
> inefficiencies. [...]
What are you suggesting here, that the implementation of FUTEX_WAKE_UP
is "ignoring inefficiencies"? Please explain why and what you would do
differently to solve that inefficiency.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-31 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-28 7:37 [PATCH] 2.6.16 - futex: small optimization (?) Pierre PEIFFER
2006-03-28 10:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-03-28 15:02 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-03-28 22:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-03-29 15:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-30 20:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-03-31 6:01 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-03-31 14:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-03-31 18:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-29 13:18 ` Pierre PEIFFER
2006-03-29 15:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-03-30 14:51 ` Pierre PEIFFER
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060331060155.GA21975@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.