From: Florian Kirstein <xenlist@custom.ray.net>
To: Xen development list <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: xendomains init script
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060331062717.D26981@web.ray.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060330212128.GQ14102@redhat.com>; from veillard@redhat.com on Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:21:28PM -0500
Hi,
> Associated bug at Red Hat is
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171056
Oh, if I had known the old version (completely different from the more
advanced current one) of the script already had the same problem, I had
searched there :)
> yes this is a problem, but I didn't tried the patch yet, I assume you tested
> it on FC5,
The patch works for xen 3.0.1 (and newer, possibly some older)
on all redhat-based distributions, as it simply moves the redhat check
before the LSB check (like Jonathan did for the older script).
Additionally it "fixes" the alias problem for possible other
distributions which also use aliases to build the LSB compatibility.
And yes: the patch applies cleanly when added for example as Patch13
(using -p1) to the FC5 xen SRPM, even though I intended it to be included
in the main xen distribution as I don't see any negative impacts - and it's
a bug in the script in the first place to assume no aliases are used for
LSB.
For RedHat I'd independently suggest to follow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171052
and change the lsb-compatibility. Sure, LSB explicitly allows use of
aliases as the link in my original mail shows, so it is not really
a bug if you read the spec by the word, but IMHO it's still a bad
idea to do so :) Using functions like suggested in Bug 158183 and the
one linked above simply will result in less trouble also in possible
other cases.
(:ul8er, r@y
(oh my god, how much text for such a simple issue, sorry to all :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-31 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-19 9:44 xendomains init script Kurt Garloff
2005-10-26 17:11 ` Ewan Mellor
2005-10-26 17:27 ` Kurt Garloff
2006-03-30 3:57 ` Florian Kirstein
2006-03-30 4:09 ` Florian Kirstein
2006-03-30 21:21 ` Daniel Veillard
2006-03-31 4:27 ` Florian Kirstein [this message]
2007-02-28 5:20 ` Florian Kirstein
2007-02-28 14:51 ` Keir Fraser
2007-02-28 17:26 ` Florian Kirstein
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-26 19:05 Ian Pratt
2005-10-26 23:35 ` Chris Bainbridge
2005-10-27 14:15 Ian Pratt
2005-10-27 15:16 ` Chris Bainbridge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060331062717.D26981@web.ray.net \
--to=xenlist@custom.ray.net \
--cc=veillard@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.