From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:24:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060331152401.GM9811@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060331150453.GB9207@ti64.telemetry-investments.com>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 10:04:53AM -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:57:26PM +0200, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
> > True. But it is my impression that this is a problem isolated on the
> > client side (am I wrong?)
>
> That seems to be the case.
Hmm...
>
> > Do you mean NFS exporting a local filesystem, NFS mounting it again on
> > the local host? Or do you mean something with loopback mounts?
>
> The former; just export a local directory to 127.0.0.1 in /etc/exports,
> then mount it on /mnt.
With a local export/mount I see very few reads running the test :/
Could this be a timing issue? That pages in the cache are invalidated
after maybe less than 100 microseconds which is roughly the round-trip
time on the gigabit network connecting my server and client?
/proc/self/mountstats on the two filesystems look identical to me:
device sparrow:/exported/joe mounted on /u/joe with fstype nfs statvers=1.0
opts: rw,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,acregmin=3,acregmax=60,
acdirmin=30,acdirmax=60,hard,intr,proto=udp,timeo=7,retrans=3
device localhost:/home/test mounted on /mnt with fstype nfs statvers=1.0
opts: rw,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,acregmin=3,acregmax=60,
acdirmin=30,acdirmax=60,hard,intr,proto=udp,timeo=7,retrans=3
--
/ jakob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-31 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-31 9:48 NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15 Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 11:22 ` NFS client regression, simple test program Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 12:22 ` NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15 Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 12:45 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 13:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 13:21 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 13:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 14:08 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 14:35 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 14:49 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 14:57 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 15:04 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 15:24 ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2006-03-31 16:35 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-03-31 18:52 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-03-31 15:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-31 16:04 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-03 15:26 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-03 15:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-03 15:45 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-04 9:22 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-04-24 22:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-25 8:08 ` Jakob Oestergaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060331152401.GM9811@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.