From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FPiuj-0004hZ-TV for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:25:25 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPiui-0004fq-IT for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:25:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPiug-0004cj-GL for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:25:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FPiuf-0004cJ-C8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:25:21 -0500 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FPixJ-0002Yg-F4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:28:05 -0500 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8773C00627C for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:33:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B773C004AD1 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:33:47 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 18:25:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <87y7yp8e6o.fsf@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <87y7yp8e6o.fsf@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604011825.15250.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.475487, version=0.17.2 Subject: Re: TCP timers and telnet X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 16:25:24 -0000 On Saturday 01 April 2006 18:15, Marco Gerards wrote: > So I was thinking, why not add such functionality to GRUB 2? It's > easy to implement with the networking code I currently have. The only > thing about it that sucks is that we have to implement multitheading, > kinda... I object to multithreading. It makes our life just harder. I prefer an event-driven approach as you suggested before. Okuji