From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751695AbWDCJ1u (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 05:27:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751694AbWDCJ1u (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 05:27:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:16361 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751397AbWDCJ1u (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 05:27:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 02:27:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Keith Owens Cc: mitch@sfgoth.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc1 core_sys_select incompatible pointer types Message-Id: <20060403022701.5a2144cc.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <26766.1144055892@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060403020916.57c9eaec.akpm@osdl.org> <26766.1144055892@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Keith Owens wrote: > > When did arithmetic on void pointers become acceptable? I know that it > is a gcc extension but AFAIK its use is discouraged. Or am I in the > wrong parallel universe again? Yes, it's a gccism, but we actually use it rather a lot here and there. It's quite useful for avoiding casting.