From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: acahalan@gmail.com
Cc: ak@muc.de, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 32-on-64 (x86-64) siginfo corruption
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:41:20 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060405.214120.71087991.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <787b0d920604052020rdaa5146q58720e7fd82ce0bb@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 23:20:07 -0400
> The situation: 32-bit debugger, 32-bit child, 64-bit kernel
>
> The debugger sends an RT signal to the child. (to stop it, with
> a queue and siginfo so that non-debugger signals don't get lost)
> To do this, the debugger uses tgkill().
>
> Later, the debugger checks the child's siginfo_t before discarding
> it. This is to be sure that the child didn't get the RT signal from
> some other source. The debugger fills a siginfo_t with 0xff, then
> fetches siginfo data via ptrace. The data is corrupt:
>
> FIELD 32-ON-64 NORMAL
> si_pid -1 getpid()
> si_uid getpid() getuid()
>
> The "getpid" and "getuid" above are done in the debugger, not in
> the child. The si_code values are SI_TKILL.
>
> Probably the other ports with 32-on-64 support ought to verify
> that this stuff works right.
Ugh, just like PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG we'll need translations for
GETSIGINFO and SETSIGINFO.
I've CC'd linux-arch which is where the port maintainers hang
out and look for postings about issues like this. I mentioned
the PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG issue there just the other day.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-06 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-06 3:20 32-on-64 (x86-64) siginfo corruption Albert Cahalan
2006-04-06 4:41 ` David S. Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060405.214120.71087991.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=acahalan@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.