From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751091AbWDJJZU (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 05:25:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751089AbWDJJZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 05:25:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:47312 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751088AbWDJJZR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 05:25:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:24:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Laurent Vivier Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sho@tnes.nec.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB Message-Id: <20060410012431.716d1000.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1144660270.5816.3.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr> References: <20060325223358sho@rifu.tnes.nec.co.jp> <1143485147.3970.23.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060327131049.2c6a5413.akpm@osdl.org> <20060327225847.GC3756@localhost.localdomain> <1143530126.11560.6.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr> <1143568905.3935.13.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com> <1143623605.5046.11.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr> <1143682730.4045.145.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060329175446.67149f32.akpm@osdl.org> <1144660270.5816.3.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Laurent Vivier wrote: > > Does the attached patch look like the thing you though about ? I guess so. But it'll need a lot of performance testing on big SMP to work out what the impact is.