All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] coredump: kill ptrace related stuff
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:35:52 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060410133511.GA85@oleg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060410045451.434ED1809D1@magilla.sf.frob.com>

On 04/09, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > With this patch zap_process() sets SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT while sending
> > SIGKILL to the thread group.
>
> do_coredump has already done this.  So you are addressing the case of other
> thread groups sharing the mm, right?

Yes,

> > This means that a TASK_TRACED task
> >
> > 	1. Will be awakened by signal_wake_up(1)
>
> That should always happen regardless of signal->flags, so yes.
>
> > 	2. Can't sleep again via ptrace_notify()
>
> What makes this be so?  What if it's entering a notification event now?
> What about exit tracing?

It turns out I misread SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT check in ptrace_stop(),
didn't notice '(->parent->signal != current->signal) ||' before
it.

You are right, this is a problem, I need to think about it.

Do you see any solution which doesn't need tasklist_lock to be
held while traversing global process list?

> > 	3. Can't go to do_signal_stop() after return
> > 	   from ptrace_stop() in get_signal_to_deliver()
>
> This is only true because of the check in get_signal_to_deliver,
> which I've said I think should be taken out for other reasons.

Yes, changelog refers to SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT check in get_signal_to_deliver.
However, do_signal_stop() returns 0 when it doesn't see SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED,
(which was cleared by SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT), so I think we don't depend on
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT check in get_signal_to_deliver. No?

Btw, I don't understand Andrea's patch (and changelog) too.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-10  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-06 22:06 [PATCH 3/4] coredump: kill ptrace related stuff Oleg Nesterov
2006-04-10  4:54 ` Roland McGrath
2006-04-10 13:35   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2006-04-11  1:21     ` Roland McGrath
2006-04-13 12:58       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060410133511.GA85@oleg \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.