From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Thompson Subject: Re: Error: Received invalid response from Xend, twice. Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:16:16 +0000 Message-ID: <20060411211616.GA29376@aktzero.com> References: <20060404155147.GB18206@aktzero.com> <20060411125637.GG28252@leeni.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060411125637.GG28252@leeni.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ewan Mellor Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:56:37PM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: > The message "Error: Received invalid response from Xend, twice." means that > Xend has crashed whilst xm was talking to it, xm has retried, and it has > crashed again. There is a known bug with this happening very intermittently, > but if you are seeing this permanently, I'd say yes, your strange compiler > options are almost certainly to blame. You might try a full clean make with > those options turned on (you might have a mixed build by accident) but > otherwise, I think you're on your own, sorry. Yesterday, I think, I discovered the line in my xend.log that confirms your diagnosis: [2006-04-03 13:26:16 xend] CRITICAL (SrvDaemon:190) Xend died due to signal 9! Restarting it. I have tweaked the Gentoo CFLAGS and have an emerge -e world in progress. I will update the list afterwards. -- Andrew Thompson http://aktzero.com/