From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Dan Bonachea <bonachead@comcast.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: pthread-safety bug in write(2) on Linux 2.6.x
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:56:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060413025608.3edbf603.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20060413015645.033d3fc8@comcast.net>
Dan Bonachea <bonachead@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> This problem arose in the parallel runtime system for a scientific language
> compiler (nearly a million lines of code total - definitely a "real-world"
> program) - the example code is merely a pared-down demonstration of the
> problem. In parallel scientific computing, it's very common for many threads
> to be writing to stdout (usually for monitoring purposes) and it's expected
> and normal for output from separate threads to be arbitrarily interleaved, but
> it's *not* ok for output to be lost entirely. This is essentially equivalent
> to the real-world example you gave of many threads logging to a file.
Interesting - afaik that's the first time this has been hit in a real
application.
> We've worked around the problem in Linux 2.6 by adding locking at user-level
> around our writes, as you suggest, although this of course penalizes our
> performance on kernels that already correctly implement the thread-safety
> required by the POSIX spec. In any case it seemed like a problem that we
> should report, to be good open-source citizens - especially given that it
> appears to be a regression with respect to the Linux 2.4 kernel. How you
> choose to handle the report is of course your decision.
yup, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-13 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 1:45 PROBLEM: pthread-safety bug in write(2) on Linux 2.6.x Dan Bonachea
2006-04-13 2:10 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-13 4:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13 5:33 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-13 15:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 15:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-14 10:20 ` Nikita Danilov
2006-04-13 21:50 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-13 22:06 ` Dan Bonachea
2006-04-13 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 23:11 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-13 23:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 23:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-13 23:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 23:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-13 9:18 ` Dan Bonachea
2006-04-13 9:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-04-13 10:28 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-04-13 14:14 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-12-19 22:45 ` Jens Moser
[not found] <60Z8f-4QA-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <611Wl-u5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <616k2-6Xz-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-04-14 9:14 ` Kai Henningsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-27 9:06 Samuel Thibault
2006-04-27 15:23 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060413025608.3edbf603.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bonachead@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.