From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: "Jouni Malinen" <jkm@devicescape.com>
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, dcbw@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
softmac-dev@sipsolutions.net, zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] softmac: return -EAGAIN from getscan while scanning
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:28:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060413152853.149186fb.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060413160051.GE15499@instant802.com>
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:00:51 -0700, "Jouni Malinen" <jkm@devicescape.com> wrote:
> That could be blocking an ioctl call for couple of seconds
> and would be quite horrible for single threaded programs.
I would say that waiting for couple of seconds in the kernel would
be quite wonderful for single threaded programs, when you consider
the alternative. I can guess now what your concern is, even though
you failed to articulate it: a single-threaded GUI application,
which cannot respond to events when blocked in getting scan results.
If that's the case, we should be looking at having both blocking
and non-blocking calls to fetch scan results.
> [...] but what if some other program were
> to request a new scan between the completion event and the attempt to
> read the previous scan results..
I do not see how this is relevant.
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-13 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060411085805.949313000@sipsolutions.net>
2006-04-13 0:42 ` [patch 4] softmac: fix event sending Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <20060411085841.252064000@sipsolutions.net>
2006-04-13 9:00 ` [patch 1/3] softmac: return -EAGAIN from getscan while scanning Pete Zaitcev
2006-04-13 9:06 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 9:34 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 12:14 ` Dan Williams
2006-04-13 16:13 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-04-15 19:24 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-15 21:27 ` Dan Williams
2006-04-13 12:12 ` Dan Williams
2006-04-13 12:19 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 16:00 ` Jouni Malinen
2006-04-13 22:28 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2006-04-13 22:45 ` Jouni Malinen
2006-04-13 23:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-13 23:35 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-04-13 22:21 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-04-13 9:41 ` [patch 5] softmac: report when scanning has finished Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 12:15 ` Dan Williams
2006-04-13 23:58 [patch 1/3] softmac: return -EAGAIN from getscan while scanning Jean Tourrilhes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-14 0:01 Jean Tourrilhes
2006-04-14 15:58 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060413152853.149186fb.zaitcev@redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=jkm@devicescape.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=softmac-dev@sipsolutions.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.