From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Mackall Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:08:34 +0000 Subject: [KJ] Re: [Patch] use dynamic spinlock initialisation in Message-Id: <20060418170834.GG15445@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============67161464211002042==" List-Id: To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============67161464211002042== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:04:19PM +0200, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > static int __init rand_initialize(void) > { > + spin_lock_init(&input_pool.lock); > + spin_lock_init(&blocking_pool.lock); > + spin_lock_init(&nonblocking_pool.lock); > init_std_data(&input_pool); > init_std_data(&blocking_pool); > init_std_data(&nonblocking_pool); Something about this hunk suggests a better way to do this. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. --===============67161464211002042== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============67161464211002042==--