From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FWP1c-00085m-Ha for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:36:08 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWP1b-00085e-UN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:36:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWP1a-00085S-GM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:36:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWP1a-00085P-Cn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:36:06 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWP2o-0003NP-TE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:37:23 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4303C00628E for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:52:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E753C00628A for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:52:37 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:36:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1145464245.9435.3.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> <877j5lbk13.fsf@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <877j5lbk13.fsf@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604200436.04740.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.228436, version=0.17.2 Subject: Re: grub cvs ... configfile X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:36:08 -0000 On Wednesday 19 April 2006 18:35, Marco Gerards wrote: > Hollis Blanchard writes: > >> I think the menuentry were much better and more descriptive. I don't > >> think there is a need to have both and it only confuses people. So I > >> would propose to remove @-version. > > > > I agree. The "@" is a very odd syntax. Since "menuentry" works as well, > > I think "@" should be removed. > > It was added because Okuji wanted something short for this. I do not > care as long as there is a long command. Marco is right. This was my request. @ is just a command aliased for menuentry, and I like it. Since you are not obligated to use @, please do not remove it. Okuji