From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SCSI: implement scsi_eh_schedule_cmd() Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:01:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20060420130113.GA10415@infradead.org> References: <20060419184916.22608.qmail@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4446ECCF.7080000@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:55428 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750892AbWDTNB2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:01:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4446ECCF.7080000@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: ltuikov@yahoo.com, Patrick Mansfield , Jeff Garzik , hch@lst.de, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, albertcc@tw.ibm.com, arjan@infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:07:11AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > James and Jeff, any opinion on this matter? I think you hack looks okayish. But I want to see the whole libata ->eh_strategy_handler first.