All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 1.3.0 creating bigger packs than 1.2.3
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:32:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060421023222.GA1117@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060421012029.GB819@spearce.org>

I just tried the patch below on a couple-month-old Linux 2.6
repository from Linus (last commit: Feb 14 2006).  It did not
decrease the pack file size by much despite the higher delta:

  'next'       Total 189435, written 189435 (delta 142093), reused 44057 (delta 0)
  'next'+patch Total 189435, written 189435 (delta 142712), reused 43954 (delta 0)

  'next'       104464297 bytes
  'next'+patch 104092920 bytes (99.6% of 'next')

  'next'       328.98 real       206.02 user        93.60 sys
  'next'+patch 363.06 real       218.98 user        94.72 sys

So it looks like the patch is taking longer to run, and by about 10%.
An expensive price to pay for what amounts to only a 0.4% reduction
in pack size on the kernel.


Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> Based on Linus' comment I changed your patch to just the following.
> It still produced the 46M pack file, so the first hunk apears to
> not have had much of an affect with this data.
> 
> From a running time perspective it appears as though this patch is
> making things slightly better, not worse.  I ran it a few times
> for each case always using the 46M pack as input for
>  "git-repack -a -d -f".
> 
>   'next'       137.13 real        95.82 user        25.24 sys
>   'next'+patch 131.62 real        89.35 user        28.56 sys
> 
> but even if the running time was an extra 6 seconds I'd still rather
> spend 4% more running time to use 1/2 the storage space.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/pack-objects.c b/pack-objects.c
> index 09f4f2c..f7d6217 100644
> --- a/pack-objects.c
> +++ b/pack-objects.c
> @@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ static int try_delta(struct unpacked *cu
>         if (cur_entry->delta)
>                 max_size = cur_entry->delta_size-1;
>         if (sizediff >= max_size)
> -               return -1;
> +               return 0;
>         delta_buf = diff_delta(old->data, oldsize,
>                                cur->data, size, &delta_size, max_size);
>         if (!delta_buf)

-- 
Shawn.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-21  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-20 13:36 1.3.0 creating bigger packs than 1.2.3 Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 14:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 15:03   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 16:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 16:43       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 17:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 17:24           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-20 17:31           ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 17:54             ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-04-20 21:31             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-20 21:53               ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 21:56               ` Jakub Narebski
2006-04-20 17:41           ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-04-20 17:55           ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 18:24             ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-04-20 18:49               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-20 21:02                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-04-20 21:40                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-20 22:02                     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 22:35                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-21  1:01                         ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-20 22:59                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-21  0:52                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-04-21  1:20                     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-21  2:28                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-04-21  2:40                         ` Shawn Pearce
2006-04-21  3:07                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-04-21  2:32                       ` Shawn Pearce [this message]
2006-04-20 23:02                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-20 16:09 ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060421023222.GA1117@spearce.org \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.