From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 'make headers_install' kbuild target.
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:33:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060422093328.GM19754@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1145672241.16166.156.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:17:20AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>...
> Implementation details aside, the point is that we can now work on
> refining the choice of headers to be exported, and more importantly we
> can start fixing the _contents_ of those headers so that nothing which
> should be private is exported in them outside #ifdef __KERNEL__.
>
> I've chosen headers in the generic directories and in asm-powerpc; the
> other asm directories could do with a proper selection being made; the
> rest of the current list is just inherited from Fedora's
> glibc-kernheaders package for now.
>
> For a start, the headers I've marked for export are sometimes including
> headers which _weren't_ so marked, and hence which don't exist in our
> exported set of headers. I've started to move those inclusions into
> #ifdef __KERNEL__ where appropriate, but there's more of that to do
> before we can even use these for building anything and actually start to
> test them in earnest.
>
> Adrian, I'm hoping we can persuade you to help us audit the resulting
> contents of usr/include/* and apply your usual treatment to the headers
> until it looks sane. That assistance would be very much appreciated.
My thirst thought is:
Is this really the best approach, or could this be done better?
I'm currently more a fan of a separate kabi/ subdir with headers used by
both headers under linux/ and userspace.
Why?
Unless I'm misunderstanding this, your changes are giving a result
identical result to simply using the current kernel headers (stripping
the #ifdef __KERNEL__ stuff doesn't change anything).
If we want to define an ABI and do it right, the resulting ABI headers
should be write-only, and should even continue to contain the ABI for
code already removed from the kernel.
It should be possible to do this incrementically:
- without breaking the kernel at any time
- with no userspace breakages when switching to the ABI headers for
userspace (there might be corner cases, and if e.g. the asm-i386/atomic.h
abuse by MySQL breaks that's not a loss)
This might take a bit longer, but as a result we have:
- an ABI where diffstat is able to tell us if someone has touched the ABI
(can git trigger electric shocks for everyone trying to commit or pull
changes to the kabi/ subdir? ;-) )
- as a side effect, some cleanup of the current kernel headers
Unless someone can tell me a reason why this wouldn't work (except for
being a bit more work than your approach), this is the approach I have
in mind for working on.
> dwmw2
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-22 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-22 2:17 [PATCH] 'make headers_install' kbuild target David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 9:33 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-04-22 12:03 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 12:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-22 12:48 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 13:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-22 13:36 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 14:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-22 14:26 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 14:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-22 14:56 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 15:30 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 21:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-23 7:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-23 16:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-23 17:00 ` Joshua Hudson
2006-04-22 14:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-22 14:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-22 14:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-22 14:47 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-22 14:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-28 18:15 ` Rob Landley
2006-04-28 18:27 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-28 19:59 ` Rob Landley
2006-04-22 14:35 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-23 20:47 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-24 0:12 ` David Woodhouse
2006-04-28 18:13 ` Rob Landley
2006-04-28 18:22 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060422093328.GM19754@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.