From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bryan =?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?= Subject: Re: strncpy (maybe others) broken on Alpha Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20060422103907.GA7693@mail.fl.dk> References: <20060420215723.GA3949@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> <20060421024304.2D851DBA1@gherkin.frus.com> <20060421081500.GA3767@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> <20060421092127.GA7382@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> <20060421095028.GA8818@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060421095028.GA8818@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> Sender: linux-alpha-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" To: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer , Bob Tracy , Ivan Kokshaysky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer wro= te: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:21:27AM +0200, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer w= rote: > > The bad news is my test case, compiled with a native gcc version 3.= 4.4 > > and binutils version 2.16.1 doesn't work as expected. So maybe it'= s > > combination of gcc/binutils? I'm booting the new kernel just to co= nfirm > > that 3.4.4 and 2.16.1 do not work. >=20 > A native gcc 3.4.4 and binutils 2.16.1 do not work... What should we > try next? >=20 =46or what it's worth, I've found gcc 3.4.4 to be bad on gentoo. If I compile any binutils-2.16.[01] versions with 3.4.4 ld segfaults when trying to compile gmp. I don't know of any binutils related problems when using gcc 3.4.6 currently. Regards, Bryan =C3=98stergaard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750740AbWDVRPq (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:15:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750741AbWDVRPq (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:15:46 -0400 Received: from zeus1.kernel.org ([204.152.191.4]:52884 "EHLO zeus1.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750740AbWDVRPp (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:15:45 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:39:08 +0200 From: Bryan =?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?= To: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer , Bob Tracy , Ivan Kokshaysky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net Subject: Re: strncpy (maybe others) broken on Alpha Message-ID: <20060422103907.GA7693@mail.fl.dk> References: <20060420215723.GA3949@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> <20060421024304.2D851DBA1@gherkin.frus.com> <20060421081500.GA3767@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> <20060421092127.GA7382@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> <20060421095028.GA8818@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060421095028.GA8818@bigip.bigip.mine.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:21:27AM +0200, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer wrote: > > The bad news is my test case, compiled with a native gcc version 3.4.4 > > and binutils version 2.16.1 doesn't work as expected. So maybe it's > > combination of gcc/binutils? I'm booting the new kernel just to confirm > > that 3.4.4 and 2.16.1 do not work. > > A native gcc 3.4.4 and binutils 2.16.1 do not work... What should we > try next? > For what it's worth, I've found gcc 3.4.4 to be bad on gentoo. If I compile any binutils-2.16.[01] versions with 3.4.4 ld segfaults when trying to compile gmp. I don't know of any binutils related problems when using gcc 3.4.6 currently. Regards, Bryan Østergaard