From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Lodal Subject: Re: condition for 2.6.16 Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:47:28 +0200 Message-ID: <200604231547.29009.simonl@parknet.dk> References: <200604201919.19246.max@nucleus.it> <4447D7AA.1010602@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Massimiliano Hofer , Patrick McHardy Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <4447D7AA.1010602@trash.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Thursday 20 April 2006 20:49, Patrick McHardy wrote: > We have already decided that the condition match will not be merged > because the same thing can easily be done by adding/removing rules > from userspace. Conditions enable role separation between us admins. No matter how good or fast the userspace tools are, there are cases where you simply do not want to (let others) run them, but it is acceptable to (let others) turn on/off some predefined blocks of rules. Plus it is faster, less risky, and does not reset counters. Simon