From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:09:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060424160943.4bbdb788.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060424111141.GC16007@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> @@ -485,6 +485,14 @@ int rcu_pending(int cpu)
> __rcu_pending(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk, &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
> }
>
> +int rcu_soon_pending(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu);
> + struct rcu_data *rdp_bh = &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu);
> +
> + return (!!rdp->curlist || !!rdp_bh->curlist);
> +}
This patch sets my nerves a-jangling.
What are the units of soonness? It's awfully waffly. Can we specify this
more tightly?
Neither rcu_pending() nor rcu_soon_pending() are commented or documented.
Pity the poor user trying to work out what they do, and how they differ.
They're global symbols and they form part of the RCU API - they should be
kernel docified, please.
There's probably a reason why neither of these symbols are exported to
modules. Once they're actually documented I mught be able to work out what
that reason is ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-24 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-24 11:11 [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface Heiko Carstens
2006-04-24 23:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-04-25 5:27 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 11:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-04-25 11:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 12:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-04-25 12:27 ` [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_needs_cpu() interface Heiko Carstens
[not found] ` <20060426141205.58675763.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-04-27 8:11 ` [patch] RCU: add comments to rcu_pending/rcu_needs_cpu Heiko Carstens
2006-05-01 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-05-02 6:35 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 12:28 ` [patch] s390: exploit rcu_needs_cpu() interface Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 11:23 ` [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface Paul E. McKenney
2006-04-25 11:33 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-04-25 11:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060424160943.4bbdb788.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.