From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FY5Op-0002Sj-GJ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:03:03 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FY5On-0002SS-R4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:03:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FY5Om-0002QB-3W for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:03:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FY5Ol-0002Q8-Uv for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:02:59 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FY5R3-00071U-Bt for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:05:21 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955043C78099B for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F98B3C780997 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:21:29 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:02:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200604201254.k3KCslFP009167@dell01.dinaserver.com> <444C8662.1080908@raulete.net> In-Reply-To: <444C8662.1080908@raulete.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604242002.53036.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.471546, version=0.17.2 Subject: Re: Parted/GRUB joint-venture X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:03:02 -0000 On Monday 24 April 2006 10:03, adrian15 wrote: > I do not know if okuji has talked to you directly. Sorry. I talked with him privately, because I was not sure if it would be good to discuss it in public. Okuji