From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:23:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604251723.01448.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604241354200.3701@g5.osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 810 bytes --]
On Monday 24 April 2006 23:07, you wrote:
> A long time ago, I had a machine with a 3c509 card that would sometimes
Heh, I still have this one in my server. :)
> The fake interrupt could even print out a warning if somebody returns
> SA_HANDLED (since normally there _shouldn't_ have been any work to handle
> for it),
Are you sure this can't race against the hardware?
Something like this:
Kernel Hardware
- generate fake IRQ
- enter the low level IRQ handling
- hardware generates an IRQ and
sets it's IRQ reason registers
to "I have smthng to do"
- enter the handler and service
the IRQ
- return SA_HANDLED
--
Greetings Michael.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-25 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-24 18:41 better leve triggered IRQ management needed Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 18:59 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-24 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 19:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-24 20:16 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-24 20:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-24 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 21:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-24 22:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 21:22 ` [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 21:49 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-24 21:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 22:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <20060424141926.3872f921@localhost.localdomain>
2006-04-24 21:22 ` [RFC 2/2] warn on shared edge-triggered irq Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-25 15:23 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-04-24 19:15 ` better leve triggered IRQ management needed Russell King
2006-04-24 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 19:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 19:35 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-24 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 20:50 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-24 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-29 21:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-29 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-30 4:48 ` Neil Brown
2006-04-30 5:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-30 6:13 ` Neil Brown
2006-04-30 6:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-02 5:10 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-02 15:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-30 7:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604251723.01448.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.