From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FYfiG-0001D3-Em for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:49:32 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FYfiE-0001Cx-Jc for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:49:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FYfiC-0001Ci-7S for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:49:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYfiC-0001Cf-02 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:49:28 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FYfkq-0000Kk-Gw for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:52:12 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B043D3C822E28; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:08:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257E53C822E27; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:08:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: FSF To: Hollis Blanchard Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:49:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <874382be2f030539710fb978a9f30f03@penguinppc.org> In-Reply-To: <874382be2f030539710fb978a9f30f03@penguinppc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604261049.23173.okuji@gnu.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500121, version=0.17.2 Cc: The development of GRUB 2 Subject: Re: grub_machine_set_prefix, --enable-mm-debug X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:49:31 -0000 On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:22, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Is there a reason not to use the runtime debugging infrastructure we > have? Most of that is "intensive" as well... What do you mean by "the runtime debugging infrastructure"? If you mean grub_dprintf, it is not enough, since you cannot embed file names and line numbers where the functions are called. Okuji