From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc2] swsusp resume must not device_suspend()
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:44:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604261344.24694.nigel@suspend2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604252032.42695.david-b@pacbell.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2359 bytes --]
Hi.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 13:32, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 April 2006 6:16 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 09:55, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 3:18 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > I saw the 2 suspends, 1 resume comment in another part of the thread,
> > > > but don't believe a driver would be able to detect that 2 suspends
> > > > and 1 resume call had been made - at least not without some non
> > > > volatile ram.
> > >
> > > The extra suspend is just IMO a symptom of sloppiness, like a "here may
> > > be bugs" sign. Not necessarily an issue in its own right.
> > >
> > > In fact if you count carefully, it's three suspends and one resume:
> > > one suspend before calling swsusp_resume, one inside swsusp_resume --
> > > replaced by my patch -- and a correctly matched pair in the kernel
> > > being resumed.
> >
> > That doesn't sound right. Let' see - where's this third one?
>
> I see your point ... device_suspend() and device_power_down() really
> do the same thing, but to different sets of devices. A nastily deceptive
> naming convention that I may want to fix someday.
:)
> So it's not quite fair counting those separately. Three suspend calls,
> sure ... but only two per device.
>
> > > Also, about non-volatile RAM. Not necessary ... the device hardware
> > > holds all the relevant state. The problem is that swsusp is now
> > > trashing it with those suspend calls before resuming the real kernel.
> > > On the plus side, we already have code being used to resolve the
> > > identical issue for kexec(), and all my patch does is to use it.
> >
> > If devices really do get powered down, then they won't retain the state.
> > If they don't actually powerdown, then I see your point.
>
> While the system is restarting into the snapshot, there's no powerdown.
> (Because device_power_down doesn't actually power down devices.) Q.E.D.
I thought that at least some devices might go D3cold, or is it always hot? I'm
perfectly happy to admit being an ignoramus here - I'm just beginning to work
on drivers, so still have a lot to learn.
Regards,
Nigel
--
See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info.
http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-26 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-24 21:29 [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc2] swsusp resume must not device_suspend() David Brownell
2006-04-24 21:47 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-24 22:47 ` David Brownell
2006-04-25 10:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-25 14:41 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-25 17:37 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2006-04-25 20:45 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-26 0:30 ` David Brownell
2006-04-27 8:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-27 8:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-27 8:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-27 14:34 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2006-04-27 16:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-04-27 17:41 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-27 19:21 ` David Brownell
2006-04-27 20:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-27 20:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-25 16:56 ` David Brownell
2006-04-24 22:31 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-25 8:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-25 16:11 ` David Brownell
2006-04-25 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-25 20:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-25 20:53 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-25 21:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-25 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-25 22:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-25 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-25 23:55 ` David Brownell
2006-04-26 1:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-26 3:32 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2006-04-26 3:44 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2006-04-26 14:24 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-26 19:47 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2006-04-25 21:04 ` David Brownell
2006-04-25 21:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-25 23:13 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2006-04-26 9:07 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-25 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-25 22:56 ` David Brownell
2006-04-26 11:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-26 14:38 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2006-04-26 15:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-26 15:38 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-26 16:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-26 19:06 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-26 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-26 21:31 ` David Brownell
2006-04-26 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-04-27 19:44 ` David Brownell
2006-04-25 15:56 ` David Brownell
2006-04-27 10:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-25 13:50 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2006-04-25 15:49 ` David Brownell
2006-04-27 1:22 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-04-27 19:41 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2006-05-02 16:12 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-05-26 3:06 ` David Brownell
2006-05-26 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-05-26 23:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-27 0:19 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2006-05-27 16:38 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-05 15:31 ` David Brownell
2006-06-05 16:36 ` [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc5-git 0/6] PM_EVENT_PRETHAW David Brownell
2006-06-05 16:36 ` [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc5-git 1/6] fix broken/dubious driver suspend() methods David Brownell
[not found] ` <20060530191140.GA4017@ucw.cz>
2006-06-07 0:53 ` David Brownell
2006-06-05 16:37 ` [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc5-git 2/6] add PM_EVENT_PRETHAW David Brownell
2006-05-30 19:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-07 1:02 ` David Brownell
2006-06-05 16:38 ` [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc5-git 3/6] PM_EVENT_PRETHAW, handle in IDE and PCI David Brownell
2006-05-30 19:21 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-07 0:51 ` David Brownell
2006-06-05 16:38 ` [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc5-git 4/6] PM_EVENT_PRETHAW for various graphics cards David Brownell
2006-05-30 19:30 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-07 1:24 ` David Brownell
2006-06-07 18:57 ` PM docs and API? bsmith
2006-06-07 22:58 ` David Brownell
2006-06-05 16:38 ` [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc5-git 5/6] PM_EVENT_PRETHAW, handle for USB David Brownell
2006-06-05 16:38 ` [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc5-git 6/6] PM_EVENT_PRETHAW, issue from PM core David Brownell
2006-05-30 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604261344.24694.nigel@suspend2.net \
--to=nigel@suspend2.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.