From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?windows-1251?Q?noip?=" Subject: Re: kernel panic with connlimit and 2.6.16.* kernels Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:05:35 +0000 Message-ID: <20060426170535.27587.qmail@webhost66.com> Reply-To: =?windows-1251?Q?noip?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hello, I've tried the patch. But the problem is still here. I want to ask what patch for kernel 2.6.16.9 should i use to set the CONFIG_STACK_BACKTRACE_COLS setting to value 2. Thank You Iavor > -------Original Message------- > From: Krzysztof Oledzki > Subject: Re: kernel panic with connlimit and 2.6.16.* kernels > Sent: 25 Apr '06 18:25 > > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, noip wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I've described my problem in the linux kernel list here: > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.2/1472.html > > > > There I've recieved a reply from Patrick McHardy: > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.2/1666.html > > > > I've used a patch for connlimit from this thread, because without the patch i can't apply the connlimit patch from the latest patch-o-matic-ng snapshot to any 2.6.16 kernel: > > http://patchwork.netfilter.org/netfilter-devel/patch.pl?id=3456 > > What about this one: ftp://ftp.ans.pl/pub/patches/nf/connlimit.patch.gz > > I have two positive replays saying that it works. > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof Olędzki