From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750958AbWD2HTu (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:19:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750970AbWD2HTu (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:19:50 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38836 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750958AbWD2HTu (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:19:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:18:18 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Andrew Morton , Vivek Goyal Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory Message-ID: <20060429071818.GA939@kroah.com> References: <20060428114732.e889ad2d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060428163409.389e895e.akpm@osdl.org> <20060428234410.GA7598@kroah.com> <20060428170519.1194b077.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060428170519.1194b077.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:05:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > This all looks fairly (but trivially) dependent upon the 64-bit-resource > > > patches in Greg's tree. Greg, were you planning on merging them in the > > > post-2.6.17 flood? > > > > Yes, I was, > > OK, thanks. > > > unless there are any objections to me doing this? > > I'd consider the patches as they stand to be ready to roll. > > All the code bloat's a bit sad though. It would have been nice to have > made the type of resource.start and .end Kconfigurable. What happened > to that? Hm, I didn't remember anything about that. Vivek, any thoughts? thanks, greg k-h