From: kelly@cliffhanger.com
To: David Sims <dpsims@dpsims.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Is there a way....
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:15:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060430211531.GH23121@Knoppix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604301836350.26623@linux.dpsims.com>
This link may have an answer. I haven't read the
entire thing but, it talks about netfilter and the
iproute2 utility.
http://www.policyrouting.org/PolicyRoutingBook/ONLINE/CH08.web.html
It's an online copy of a book (I have the hard
copy). It's a very good book.
Policy Routing With Linux - Online Edition
by Matthew G. Marsh
http://www.policyrouting.org/PolicyRoutingBook/ONLINE/TOC.html
--
kelly
http://home1.gte.net/res0psau/index.html#Hang-Gliding-Stuff
-- --
\ /
\/
/\
/ \
-- --
Quoting David Sims <dpsims@dpsims.com>:
Hi,
I want to use Linux to do NAT between some 192.168.x.x addresses
in a routed network on one side and a single 10.0.0.x/24 on the other
side. I want to do one-to-one NAT but in a dynamic way... such that a
calling address is NATed into the next available 10.0.0.x/24.... in a
round robin sort of way... IS there a way to do this using NETFILTER??
If not NETFILTER, then how??
This sort of thing is common in many-to-one NAT (port-address
translation)... but I need each call to come from a separate NATed IP
address to support my application (TN3270 session)... It's OK to reuse
addresses after a call (session) is complete, but each session needs to
come from it's own fixed (for the duration of the session) IP address....
The exact application that I am trying to support is connecting to an
IBM mainframe from random hosts in a routed network via an Attachmate
gateway where calling addresses are mapped into terminal sessions on a 1:1
basis.... Port address translation won't work because all calls appear to
eminate from the single IP address.... I need to do 1:1 NAT but only on a
temporary basis where once a call is complete the NAT address can be used
by another caller...
Clues? Suggestions? Examples?
TIA,
Dave
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-30 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-30 23:43 Is there a way David Sims
2006-04-30 21:15 ` kelly [this message]
2006-05-01 14:50 ` Andy Furniss
2006-05-01 3:45 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-05-02 21:02 ` R. DuFresne
2006-05-03 2:22 ` David Sims
2006-05-02 22:40 ` kelly
2006-05-04 19:40 ` Pascal Hambourg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060430211531.GH23121@Knoppix \
--to=kelly@cliffhanger.com \
--cc=dpsims@dpsims.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.