From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Harper Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xen: Add NUMA support to Xen Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:39:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20060502143910.GA16776@us.ibm.com> References: <20060501215648.GU16776@us.ibm.com> <28761a939c7a83af7fa1c34e8700025f@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28761a939c7a83af7fa1c34e8700025f@cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ryan Grimm List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org * Keir Fraser [2006-05-02 09:16]: > > On 1 May 2006, at 22:56, Ryan Harper wrote: > > >NUMA support in Xen is a compile-time option via the build system. > >Passing numa=y will enable all of the NUMA functionality. We have > >tested the code with numa=y and numa=n. > > I don't want to add a compile option for this -- I want NUMA enabled > all the time and to add insignificant overhead on non-NUMA (or > small-NUMA like AMD64) systems. In fact, there's no reason for it to > add significant overhead in any situation really. OK, agreed. -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253 ryanh@us.ibm.com