From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 04 May 2006 07:49:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from pops.net-conex.com ([204.244.176.3]:36792 "EHLO mail.net-conex.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133525AbWEDGtm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 07:49:42 +0100 Received: from curie.orbis-terrarum.net (S01060050da688d47.vc.shawcable.net [24.80.100.253]) by mail.net-conex.com (8.13.4/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k446ndC1017198 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 23:49:40 -0700 Received: (qmail 27368 invoked by uid 10000); 3 May 2006 23:49:45 -0700 Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 23:49:45 -0700 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: Herbert Valerio Riedel Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: au1000_etc.c phylib rewrite Message-ID: <20060504064945.GE12203@curie-int.vc.shawcable.net> Mail-Followup-To: Herbert Valerio Riedel , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20060501144633.025e4e20@205.166.54.3> <1146510542.16643.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1146510542.16643.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.2.20060501144633.025e4e20@205.166.54.3> <5.1.0.14.2.20060502095256.01fd4210@205.166.54.3> <1146674056.31241.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="maH1Gajj2nflutpK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1146674056.31241.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 11298 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: robbat2@gentoo.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips --maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > while at it, does anyone happen to know what the phy-addr/MAC assignment > on the XXS1500 is? Nope. > but one thing that seems strange to me; CONFIG_BCM5222_DUAL_PHY doesn't > seem to be defined anywhere; shouldn't that be at least defined in some > Kconfig file, especially if the XXS1550 board is supposed to make use of > it?=20 Hmm, I do recall submitting a patch previously that added=20 'select BCM5222_DUAL_PHY' for the XXS1500 unit. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 --maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks iD8DBQFEWaQJPpIsIjIzwiwRAmnIAJwJWwob8g8a1FGR0B/lRFYpihXchACglqdK Wgfl2lz8nmJvKy0KPPzPW6M= =zwe8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --maH1Gajj2nflutpK--