From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Gospodarek Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] ipvs: use proper timeout instead of fixed value Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20060508031333.GA25913@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> References: <20060504201116.GA24394@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20060505004754.GA6943@verge.net.au> <20060505025111.GA29142@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20060505032052.GY32328@verge.net.au> <20060505185726.GB24394@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20060507043838.GF8374@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andy Gospodarek , netdev@vger.kernel.org, wensong@linux-vs.org, ja@ssi.bg Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39045 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932267AbWEHDN6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 May 2006 23:13:58 -0400 To: Horms Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507043838.GF8374@verge.net.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:38:40PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:57:26PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:20:54PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > > > Sorry, I missunderstood your patch completely the first time around. > > > Yes I think this is an excellent idea. Assuming its tested and works > > > I'm happy to sign off on it and prod DaveM. > > > > Horms, > > > > I'll get a setup together and post results when I have them. > > I was thinking that it would be nice if the timeout could be sent over > the wire, though that might bring in some compatibility issues, > and thus your approach might be the best idea. > > -- > Horms http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ Horms, At first I too thought about including the timeout in the messages would be nice, but it could raise compatibility issues with maybe the only advantage being that it would allow quicker timeout of connections -- something that might be undesirable in such an LVS environment. -andy