From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:58:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] linux-2.6.17-rc3-git13 fs/proc/array.c Message-Id: <20060508165845.GB12272@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============68971562407337927==" List-Id: References: <445EDBCA.9080702@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <445EDBCA.9080702@gmail.com> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============68971562407337927== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 09:40:10AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 08:18:08AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 08.05.2006 [03:27:10 -0400], Anne Thrax wrote: > > > I would rather not use my real name, as I am only 14 years old. > > > > I'm not sure I entirely understand how the one stems from the other, but > > I think the spirit of the "personal information" part of the DCO > > (Developer's Certificate of Origin, in Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > > is something like full disclosure. Also, I wonder how, if at all, the > > DCO can be enforced when it involves a minor. I'll defer to Greg on this > > one... at least on whatever precedent exists, I don't expect a legal > > decision, Greg :) > > Doesn't matter, we still need a real name. It's not a legal issue but a > "trace the blame" issue. A pseudonym + email address performs acceptably for "trace the blame". So I don't see how your two statements are related. --===============68971562407337927== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============68971562407337927==--