From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Cc: redhat-lspp@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Watch Performance
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:23:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605101523.02772.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060510163441.GT29125@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 12:34, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Hrm... Results do look good, but I wonder what had given us >10% loss
> in the baseline. Would be nice if somebody rerun the tests with 0 rules
> on lspp.24 and whatever had been used to generate original numbers and
> did it with profiling enabled.
I have that data. Original:
1295 __d_lookup 4.7786
1286 __link_path_walk 0.3405
798 avc_has_perm_noaudit 0.9099
701 _atomic_dec_and_lock 8.3452
521 audit_getname 2.0038
513 do_path_lookup 0.6877
377 _raw_spin_lock 1.5907
351 dput 0.8125
340 kmem_cache_free 1.0059
265 strncpy_from_user 2.2845
265 inode_has_perm 2.6768
263 _raw_read_lock 1.6646
Latest:
1376 __d_lookup 5.0588
1104 __link_path_walk 0.2803
997 avc_has_perm_noaudit 1.1368
940 do_path_lookup 1.2617
677 _atomic_dec_and_lock 7.6932
627 _raw_spin_lock 2.6456
448 dput 1.0370
421 kmem_cache_free 1.1566
417 inode_has_perm 4.2121
386 audit_getname 1.4846
381 link_path_walk 1.6638
333 audit_syscall_exit 0.3927
I think do_path_lookup & _raw_spin_lock jump out as the biggest changes.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-10 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-08 16:21 Watch Performance Steve Grubb
2006-04-09 19:48 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-11 13:12 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-11 3:51 ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-11 10:26 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-11 16:11 ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-11 21:01 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-11 21:21 ` Linda Knippers
2006-04-12 21:15 ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-17 15:27 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2006-04-17 20:06 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-04-21 15:01 ` Amy Griffis
2006-04-21 15:13 ` Steve Grubb
2006-04-21 15:10 ` Linda Knippers
2006-04-21 16:07 ` Alexander Viro
2006-04-24 15:34 ` Amy Griffis
2006-05-10 15:32 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-10 16:34 ` Alexander Viro
2006-05-10 19:23 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2006-05-10 19:37 ` Alexander Viro
2006-05-10 19:51 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200605101523.02772.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=redhat-lspp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.