From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Allowing REQ_FAILFAST to be set from SG_IO Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:36:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20060511103636.GJ4157@suse.de> References: <4461EFD0.50902@suse.de> <446217D5.3020606@torque.net> <1147279812.3671.8.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:33121 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030213AbWEKKgQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2006 06:36:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1147279812.3671.8.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: dougg@torque.net, Hannes Reinecke , SCSI Mailing List On Wed, May 10 2006, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 12:41 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > Looks good. There is no proposed change to sg.c . > > Could SG_FLAG_FAILFAST be made to work via sg device > > nodes? > > Rather than having to maintain two separate paths for SG_IO and hence > keep running into this issue, what will it take for sg to use the block > scsi_ioctl.c? The plan still remains to use bsg to consolidate the two. -- Jens Axboe