All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Sharyathi Nagesh <sharyath@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Bug while executing : cat /proc/iomem on 2.6.17-rc1/rc2
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:00:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060513103047.GA28366@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4462F7F4.7050908@in.ibm.com>

On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:08:12PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> 
> >Only the root should have a NULL parent, so this is just covering up some
> >other problem - you have a resource which somehow has illegally ended up
> >with a NULL parent pointer while it's been registered.
> >
> >Maybe try adding:
> >
> >		if (p->parent == NULL) {
> >			printk("resource with null parent: %lx-%lx: %s\n",
> >				p->start, p->end, p->name);
> >			break;
> >		}
> >
> >just before the test in that loop, and then finding out why that resource
> >is becoming invalid.
> >
> > 
> >
> I get this output in dmesg with the above code.
> 
> resource with null parent: 0-57ffffff: System RAM
> resource with null parent: 0-57ffffff: System RAM
> 
> x236:/home/sharyathi/linux-2.6.17-rc1/kernel # cat /proc/iomem
> 00000000-0009dbff : System RAM
> 0009dc00-0009ffff : reserved
> 000a0000-000bffff : Video RAM area
> 000c0000-000cafff : Video ROM
> 000cb000-000cc5ff : Adapter ROM
> 000f0000-000fffff : System ROM
> 00100000-c7fcb5ff : System RAM
>  00100000-004ff436 : Kernel code
>  004ff437-0068881f : Kernel data
> x236:/home/sharyathi/linux-2.6.17-rc1/kernel #
> 

Backing out 

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=10dbe196a8da6b3196881269c6639c0ec11c36cb

solves this problem for me. This patch adds memory more than 4G to /proc/iomem
but without 64-bit fields for struct resource it ends up in confusing 
iomem_resource list. I think this patch needs the core 64-bit struct resource
related changes also.


Thanks
Maneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-13 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-25 10:43 Bug while executing : cat /proc/iomem on 2.6.17-rc1/rc2 Sachin Sant
2006-04-25 10:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-11  7:27   ` Sharyathi Nagesh
2006-05-11  7:32     ` Russell King
2006-05-11  8:38       ` Sachin Sant
2006-05-13 10:30         ` Maneesh Soni [this message]
2006-05-13 14:56           ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060513103047.GA28366@in.ibm.com \
    --to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=sharyath@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.