From: Michael Halcrow <lkml@halcrow.us>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
michael.craig.thompson@gmail.com, phillip@hellewell.homeip.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, mhalcrow@us.ibm.com, mcthomps@us.ibm.com,
toml@us.ibm.com, yoder1@us.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org,
sct@redhat.com, ezk@cs.sunysb.edu, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:43:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060514034346.GA4427@halcrow.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4466A37F.4030601@yahoo.com.au>
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:26:55PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Compiling at each step is better than not. But my main point is
> that it is superfluously broken into multiple patches.
This comment is from about a year ago, so it probably has fallen off
the radar:
At 2005-06-02 14:51:54, Greg K-H wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:32:19AM -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > What sort of
> > logical chunks would you consider to be appropriate? Separate patches
> > for each file (inode.c, file.c, super.c, etc.), which represent sets
> > of functions for each major VFS object?
>
> Yes.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-14 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-13 3:37 [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:40 ` [PATCH 1/13: eCryptfs] fs/Makefile and fs/Kconfig Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 8:51 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-05-13 3:41 ` [PATCH 2/13: eCryptfs] Documentation Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:42 ` [PATCH 3/13: eCryptfs] Makefile Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:42 ` [PATCH 4/13: eCryptfs] Main module functions Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:43 ` [PATCH 5/13: eCryptfs] Header declarations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:44 ` [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:45 ` [PATCH 7/13: eCryptfs] Dentry operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:45 ` [PATCH 8/13: eCryptfs] File operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:46 ` [PATCH 9/13: eCryptfs] Inode operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:47 ` [PATCH 10/13: eCryptfs] Mmap operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-06-28 14:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-28 15:02 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-05-13 3:47 ` [PATCH 11/13: eCryptfs] Keystore Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:48 ` [PATCH 12/13: eCryptfs] Crypto functions Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 13/13: eCryptfs] Debug functions Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 4:21 ` [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set Nick Piggin
2006-05-13 16:21 ` Michael Thompson
2006-05-14 2:59 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-14 3:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-14 3:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-14 3:43 ` Michael Halcrow [this message]
2006-05-14 3:54 ` Greg KH
2006-05-15 10:17 ` David Howells
2006-05-15 10:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-20 9:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-01 20:47 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-07-07 10:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-07 11:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-07 12:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-07 17:22 ` David Quigley
2006-07-08 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-08 21:22 ` Erez Zadok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060514034346.GA4427@halcrow.us \
--to=lkml@halcrow.us \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcthomps@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
--cc=michael.craig.thompson@gmail.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=phillip@hellewell.homeip.net \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=toml@us.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yoder1@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.