From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfFi3-0006AB-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 08:28:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfFi3-00069o-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 08:28:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfFi2-00069l-Pv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 08:28:30 -0400 Received: from [213.247.139.22] (helo=mail.sub.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FfFkE-0006p3-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 08:30:46 -0400 Received: from unknown ([213.247.139.22]) by localhost (webmail.sub.ru [213.247.139.22]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 35231-19 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:28:26 +0400 (MSD) From: Mikhail Ramendik Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] w98se slow with kqemu, apparently some systems only Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:28:24 +0400 References: <200605141624.39231.mr@ramendik.ru> In-Reply-To: <200605141624.39231.mr@ramendik.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605141628.24354.mr@ramendik.ru> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I wrote: > There seems to be an issue with guest Windows 98 SE on qemu 0.8.1 and kqemu > 1.3.0pre7, on a Linux host. > > Windows 98 SE is visibly very slow; and when qemu is run with -no-kqemu, it > is actually faster. I forgot to mention that the CPU use as per "top" is constantly at 100%, almost all of it by qemu, with over 60% in "system"; With guest NT4 (which is fast) the CPU use is near zero when the NT system is idle. -- Yours, Mikhail Ramendik