From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [patch 4/9] oom: cpuset hint
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:21:19 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060515210605.30275.11106.sendpatchset@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060515210529.30275.74992.sendpatchset@linux.site>
cpuset_excl_nodes_overlap does not always indicate that killing a task will
not free any memory we for us. For example, we may be asking for an allocation
from _anywhere_ in the machine, or the task in question may be pinning memory
that is outside its cpuset. Fix this by just causing cpuset_excl_nodes_overlap
to reduce the badness rather than disallow it.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Index: linux-2.6/mm/oom_kill.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -127,6 +127,14 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct
points /= 4;
/*
+ * If p's nodes don't overlap ours, it may still help to kill p
+ * because p may have allocated or otherwise mapped memory on
+ * this node before. However it will be less likely.
+ */
+ if (!cpuset_excl_nodes_overlap(p))
+ points /= 8;
+
+ /*
* Adjust the score by oomkilladj.
*/
if (p->oomkilladj) {
@@ -196,9 +204,6 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
continue;
if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
continue;
- /* If p's nodes don't overlap ours, it won't help to kill p. */
- if (!cpuset_excl_nodes_overlap(p))
- continue;
/*
* This is in the process of releasing memory so wait for it
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-28 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-28 7:20 [patch 0/9] oom: various fixes and improvements for 2.6.18-rc2 Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:20 ` [patch 1/9] oom: use unreclaimable info Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:21 ` [patch 2/9] oom: reclaim_mapped on oom Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:21 ` [patch 3/9] cpuset: oom panic fix Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:29 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 9:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-28 7:21 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-07-28 9:07 ` [patch 4/9] oom: cpuset hint Paul Jackson
2006-07-28 7:21 ` [patch 5/9] oom: handle current exiting Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:21 ` [patch 6/9] oom: handle oom_disable exiting Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:21 ` [patch 7/9] oom: swapoff tasks tweak Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:21 ` [patch 8/9] oom: kthread infinite loop fix Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:22 ` [patch 9/9] oom: more printk Nick Piggin
2006-07-28 7:44 ` [patch 0/9] oom: various fixes and improvements for 2.6.18-rc2 Andrew Morton
2006-07-28 9:28 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060515210605.30275.11106.sendpatchset@linux.site \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.